AFRICAN YAM BEAN: A CROP WITH FOOD SECURITY POTENTIALS FOR AFRICA

 

Adewale Daniel and Dumet Dominique

 

Genetic Resources Centre, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB, 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan

E-mail: d.dumet@cgiar.org; dadewale@cgiar.org

 

Abstract

The references to African yam bean (AYB) in the African culture is proof that it had sustained livelihoods in the past. The wide diversity within the crop’s germplasm, its striking nutritional capacity as described in scientific reports, and its genetic stability across a wide range of environments with appreciable yields are reliable evidence of  the need to foster  the crop for its economic importance in Africa’s food security. Like every other crop with low/no research attention, awareness of African yam bean is poor. It is mostly appreciated by the elderly farmers and rural women. The continual availability of the genetic resources of the crop is threatened. Moreover, the cultivation of the crop may further decline due to neglect and underutilization. Wide exploration of AYB’s genetic resources in Africa will provide assurance of its future genetic improvement.  

Key words: African yam bean, genetic resources, food security, underutilized, diversity

Introduction

Sastrapradja [1] asserted that biodiversity is obviously not equally distributed on the earth; the tropical belt holds more diversity than other regions of the world. Africa has huge underexploited plant genetic resources with potentials for meeting some of her micronutrient needs; however, many food components are available but yet undiscovered in the wilds of Africa [2]. Africa is richly endowed with a very high diversity of plants in wild and cultivated forms. Thousands of them, though not commercialized, somehow adequately sustained rural livelihood for ages.

The Green Revolution has been implicated in overturning the traditional African food culture and entrenching a few crops for full commercial production, lately coupled with nutrient fortification. The global dependence on these few crops has largely affected the utilization of others which have become neglected. Their production has lessened and the diversity of their germplasm is at serious risk of genetic erosion. The depletion of crop genetic resources in Africa may have drastic consequences on hunger and malnutrition.  

Underutilized crops are indigenous, relatively common in specific areas, available, accessible, well-adapted, easy and cheap to produce, and culturally linked to the people who use them traditionally [2, 3, 4, 5]. Their cultivation and utilization usually draw on indigenous knowledge. The ecotypes and landraces of these species are cultivated less than in the past. They are rarely found in urban markets. They cannot compete with crops which now dominate the world’s food. They are hardly represented in ex situ genebanks, so efforts to characterize them depend on the limited available and loosely-representative diversity [6]. They are therefore usually ignored by policy makers probably because their economic value is not apparent [7] and hence are excluded from the development agenda by research institutions. However, underutilized crops are important as household food and their contribution to food security is unquestionably significant [2, 8].

 

 

African yam bean (AYB)

African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa), is the most economically important among the seven species of Sphenostylis [9] and it is one of the most important tuberous legumes. The domestication, cultivation, and distribution of the crop are very evident in the tropics of Africa [3, 9, 10, 11] where it had been reported to exhibit very high diversity. There is no record of any other center of diversity for the crop beyond tropical Africa. It should not be confused with the Pachyrhizus spp. which in many places in the literature are referred to as “yam bean”, Mexican yam bean, Jicama, etc. Pachyrhizus spp. is a more popular tuberous legume that is common in the tropics of Asia and Southern America.

The botanical profile and morphology of African yam bean

AYB belongs to the family Fabaceae, sub-family Papilionoideae, tribe Phaseoleae, sub-tribe Phaseolinae, and genus Sphenostylis [3, 12]. The crop has twining vigorous vines, which could be green or pigmented red. The vines twine clockwise around the stakes or climb other supports to a height of about 3 meters or more. The leaves are compound trifoliate. The large pink and purple flowers are admirable and attractive ornamentals. Pods are usually linear, housing about 20 seeds. These vary in size, shape, colour, colour pattern, etc.

 

 

Eco-geographical distribution of AYB

The origins of AYB as indicated by GRIN [13] includes the following countries within the tropical regions of Africa: Chad and Ethiopia (Northeast tropical Africa); Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (East tropical Africa); Burundi, Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo (West-Central tropical Africa); Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, and Togo (West tropical Africa); Angola, Malawi, Zambia, and Zimbabwe (South tropical Africa).  The centre of diversity of AYB is only within Africa (See Figure 1). Nigeria is very significant for AYB production (Potter, 1992) where extensive cultivation had been reported in the eastern [14] western, and southern [15] areas of Nigeria.

Domestication, cultivation, and the cultural place of AYB

AYB is rarely planted as a sole crop in Ghana and Nigeria; it is mostly interplanted with yam [3, 16]. The seeds and tubers (Plates 1 and 2) are the two organs of economic importance, providing food for humans and livestock. However, there is a cultural and regional preference for each: West Africans prefer the seeds to the tubers while the tubers are highly relished as food among East and Central Africans, especially among the Bandudus, the Shabas, and the tribe at Kinshasha in Democratic Republic of Congo [9, 17]. This exceptionally nutritious pulse [18] has a very significant link with African  sociocultural life. For instance, the Avatimes in Ghana prepare a special meal from it during the celebration of the puberty rites of adolescent girls [16]. Likewise a special meal from it features during the marriage ceremony among the Ekitis in Nigeria [9]. Different forms of local recipes are prepared from the crop to meet the dietary needs of the people.

Potentials of African yam bean

1. Food and nutrition

The economic potentials of AYB are immense. Apart from the production of two major food substances, the value of the protein in both tubers and seeds is comparatively higher than what could be obtained from most tuberous and leguminous crops [3, 17]. The protein in the tuber of AYB is more than twice the protein in sweetpotato  (Ipomea batatas) or Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum) [19] and higher than those in yam and cassava [20]. Moreover, the amino acid values in AYB seeds are higher than those in pigeon pea, cowpea, and bambara groundnut [21].  Protein content is up to 19% in the tuber and 29% in seed grain The content of crude protein in AYB seeds is lower than that in soybean, but the amino acid spectrum indicated that the level of most of the essential amino acids especially lysine, methionine, histidine, and iso-leucine in AYB is higher than those in other legumes including soybean [14, 19, 22, 23, 24]. Generally, the amino acid profile of AYB (Table 1) compares favorably with whole hens’ eggs and most of them meet the daily requirement of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) [25]. AYB is rich in minerals such as K, P, Mg, Ca, Fe, and Zn but low in Na and Cu [26, 27].

 

2. Insecticidal and medicinal usefulness

AYB as a crop is less susceptible to pests and diseases [28] compared with most legumes; this quality may undoubtedly be due to the inherent lectin in the seed of the crop. Omitogu et al. [29] advanced the prospect that the lectin in the seed of the crop is a promising source of a biologically potent insecticide against field and storage pests of legumes. Therefore, the inclusion of the lectin extract from AYB in the meal for three cowpea insect pests, namely, Maruca vitrata, Callosobruchus maculatus, and Clavigralla tomentosicollis gave a mortality rate greater than 80% after 10 days. The physiological system of C. tomentosicollis was found to be very vulnerable to the lectin in AYB [30]. In Togo, Ghana, and Nigeria, paste made from the seeds of AYB is used as a cure for stomach aches, and when the paste is mixed with water it is traditionally used for the treatment of acute drunkenness [31, 32].  Asuzu [32] reported that there might be pharmacological evidence for the use of AYB in treating such conditions.

3. Stable yield across wide environments

The seed yield of AYB can be as high as 3000kg/ha [3, 28]. The average seed/plant is between 100 and 200g and the tuber yield per plant is 0.5 kg [10, 19]. In different yield trials in Nigeria (IITA, Ibadan and Nsukka), the most productive accession in each case gave 1860 kg and 2000 kg of seeds/ha [19]. Coupled with high yield is vast adaptability to diverse edaphic conditions [33, 34]. AYB produces an appreciable yield (See Plate 3) more than most other pulses on poor soil and in a hot climate [26]. AYB has very high ability to fix nitrogen [35]; it is therefore an important crop which merits significant consideration for land reclamation

Limitations in AYB

Over time, some conditions have negatively influenced the productivity and acceptability of the crop among cultivators, consumers, and research scientists. Notable among the list are, i) the characteristic hardness of the seed coat [36, 37] which makes a high demand on the cost and time of cooking, ii) the agronomic demand for stakes, the long maturation period [11, 19], and iii) the presence of antinutritional factors (ANF) or secondary metabolites [38]. The photoperiodic sensitivity of AYB [10] seems to compound the above disadvantages as it confines the cultivation and production of the crop to one season in the year. However, a concerted crop breeding research programme may overcome these problems.

 

The way forward

Diversification in the production and utilization of crops is an essentially important strategy to alleviate food insecurity [39]. This will entail producing different foods and producing enough of each food crop to reduce its price and increase its supply, availability, and consumption. Climate change is already having a strong impact on human societies and the natural world; this is expected to continue for decades to come [40]. Africa has been identified as one of the continent most vulnerable to climate change and variability [41]. An adequate strategy needs to be in place for food security in Africa. Food security, quality of life, and livelihood for billions of people in the present and future generations are guaranteed only by the availability of diversity in crop genetic resources. Diverse genetic crop resources provide the  foundation on which crop improvement depends; moreover, they provide diversity and are sources of traits to improve yield and quality, resistance to diseases/pests, and adaptability to climatic changes. For instance, Klu et al. [16] had speculated that AYB was nearing extinction. The quantity and availability of AYB’s germplasm may have been declining over time. However, the ability of the crop to adapt to diverse environments [33, 34] may have been responsible for its continual existence and survival. Intensive exploration and conservation of large amounts of germplasm are an utmost necessity for AYB and other indigenous African crops. The amino acid requirements can be met by the consumption of mixtures of legumes in large amounts [17, 42]. Apart from the use of soybean as an animal-alternative protein source, the exploitation of protein from other legumes is rare [43]. With the acknowledgment of the nutritional potentials of AYB, the crop may well contribute to solving food security problems in Africa if its genetic diversity is saved for future genetic improvement.

 

 

 

 

 

References

 

1. Sastrapradja, S. D. 2006. Managing biodiversity for improved community well-being In: Ravi, S. B., Hoeschle-Zeledon, I., Swaminathan, M. S. and Frison, E. (ed.) Hunger and Poverty: the role of biodiversity. Report of an International Consultation on the role of Biodiversity in achieving the UN Millennium Development Goal of freedom from hunger and poverty. Chennai, India, April 18 – 19, 2005. M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India. pp. 123-130.

2. Oniang’o, R. K., Shiundu, K., Maundu, P. & Johns, T. 2006. Diversity, nutrition and food security: the case of African leafy vegetables. In: Ravi, S. B., Hoeschle-Zeledon, I.; Swaminathan, M. S. and Frison, E. (ed.). Hunger and Poverty: the role of biodiversity. Report of an International Consultation on the role of Biodiversity in achieving the UN Millennium Development Goal of freedom from hunger and poverty. Chennai, India, April 18 – 19, 2005. M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India. pp. 83-100.

3. Okigbo, B. N. 1973. Introducing the yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms. Proceedings of the first IITA Grain Legume Improvement Workshop 29 October – 2 November 1973 Ibadan. Nigeria. pp 224-238

4. Padulosi, S., Noun, J., Giuliani, A., Shuman, F., Rojas, W. & Ravi, B. 2003. Realizing the benefits in Neglected underutilized plant species through technology transfer and human resources development. Norway/UN Conference on Technology Transfer and Capacity Building. 117-127

5. Jaenicke, H. and Pasiecznik, N. 2009. Making most of underutilized crops. Leisa Magazine 25:11-12

6. Padulosi, S. & Hoeschle-Zeledon, I. 2004. Underutilized plants species: what are they? Leisa Magazine 20:5-6.

7. Stifel, L. D. 1990. The Genetic Resources. In: Ng, N. Q. & Monti, L. M. (eds.) Cowpea genetic Resource. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan pp 3-4.

8. Naylor R L, Falcon W P, Goodman R M, Jahn M M, Sengooba T, Tefera H, Nelson R J. 2004. Biotechnology in the developing world: a case for increased investments in orphan crops. Food Policy 29:15-44.

9. Potter D. 1992. Economic botany of Sphenostylis (Leguminosae). Economic Botany 46: 262-275.

10. Anochili, B. C. 1984. Tropical Agricultural Handbook. Food Crop Production. Macmillan Publishers., London. pp. 48-50.

11. Okpara, D. A. & Omaliko C. P. E. 1997. Response of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) to sowing date and plant density. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 67:220-221.

12. Allen, O.N & Allen E. K. 1981. The Leguminous. A source Book of Characterization, Uses and Nodulation. Macmillan Publishers’ Ltd., London. pp. 620.

13. GRIN, 2009. Genetic Resources Information Network (GRIN). GRIN Taxonomy for Plants. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?35250#dist.[February 5, 2010].

14. Abbey, B. W. & Berezi, P. E. 1988. Influence of processing on the digestibility of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hoechst Ex. A. Rich.)Harms) flour. Nutritional Report International 37:819-827.

15. Saka, J. O., Ajibade, S. R., Adeniyan, O. N., Olowoyo, R. B. & Ogunbodede, B. A. 2004. Survey of underutilized grain Legume production systems in the Southwest Agricultural zone of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 6:93-107.

16. Klu, G. Y. P.; Amoatey, H. M.; Bansa, D. & Kumaga, F. K. 2001. Cultivation and Uses of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) in the Volta Region of Ghana. The Journal of Food Technology in Africa 6:74-77.

17. Nwokolo, E. A.1996. The need to increase consumption of pulses in the developing world. In: Nwokolo, E. and Smart, J. (eds.) Food and feed from legumes and oilseeds. Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 3-11.

18. Rachie, K.O. 1973. Highlight of Grain Legume Improvement at IITA 1970-73. In: Proceedings of the first IITA Grain Legume Improvement Workshop, held at IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. 29 Oct – 2 Nov, 1973 pp 1-14.

19. National Research Council 1979. Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.

20. Amoatey, H. M., Klu, G. Y. P., Bansa, D., Kumaga, F. K., Aboagye, L. M., Benett, S. O. & Gamedoagbao, D. K. 2000. African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa)A neglected crop in Ghana. West African Journal of Applied Ecology 1:53-60

21. Uguru, M. I. & Madukaife, S. O. 2001. Studies on the variability in agronomic and nutritive characteristics of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst ex. A. Rich. Harms). Plant Production and Research Journal 6:10-19.

22. National Research Council. 2007. Lost Crops of Africa: Volume II: Vegetables, Development, Security, and Cooperation National Academy of Science. Washington, D.C. pp. 322-344.

23. Evans I. D. & Haismer, D. R. 1979. Rheology of gelatinized starch suspension. Journal of Texture Studies 10:347-370.

24. Ihekoronye, A. I. & Ngoddy, P. O. 1985. Integrated food science and technology for the tropics. Macmillan Publishers., London. pp. 368 -369.

25. Ekpo, A. S. 2006. Changes in Amino Acid Composition of African Yam Beans (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) and African Locust Beans (Parkia filicoida) on Cooking. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 5:254-256.

26. Nwokolo, E. A. 1987. Nutrient assessment of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) and bambara groundnut (Voandzea subterrannea), Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 41:123-129.

27. Edem, D. O., Amugo, C. I., & Eka, O. U. 1990. Chemical composition of Yam beans (Sphenostylis stenocarpa).Tropical Science 30:59-63.

28. Dukes, J. A. 1981. Handbook of Legumes of World economic Importance. Plenum Press. New York. pp. 220-222

29. Omitogun, O.G., Jackai, L.E.N. & Thottappilly, G. 1999. Isolation of insecticidal lectin-enrich extracts from African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) and other legume species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90:301-311

30. Okeola, O.G., & Machuka, J. 2001. Biological effects of African yam bean lectin on Clavigralla tomentosicollis (Hemiptera: Coreidae) Journal of Economic Entomology 94:28-34.

31. Gaisser, K. 1912. Aus dem Schutzgebiete Togo. Mitteilungen aus den deutschen Schhutzgebieten., Berlin. 25.

32. Asuzu, I.U. 1986. Pharmacological evaluation of the folklore use of Sphenostylis stenocarpa. Journal of Ethnopharm 16:263-267.

33. Schippers, R. R. 2000. African Indigenous vegetables: An overview of the cultivated species. Chatham., UK. pp.89-98.

34. Betsche, T., Azeke, M., Buening-Pfaue, H. & Fretzdorff, B. 2005. Food safety and security: fermentation as a tool to improve the nutritional value of African yam bean. Conference proceeding of the International Agricultural Research for development, October 2005, Stuttgart – Hohenheim. pp. 1-5.

35. Assefa, F. & Kleiner, D. 1997. Nodulation of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) by Bradyrhizobium sp. Isolated from Erythrina brucei. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25:209-210.

36. Oshodi, A.A., Ipinmoroti, K. O., Adeyeye, E. I. & Hall, G. M. 1995. In vitro Multienzyme digestibility of protein of six varieties of African yam bean flours. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 69:373-377.

37. Ene-Obong, E. E. & Okoye F. I. 1993. Effect of seed coat on water permeability on the African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa). Nigeria Journal of Botany 6:43-51.

38. Machuka, J. & Okeola,O. G. 2000. One- and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis identification of African yam bean seed proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2296-2299.

39. Kataki, P. K. 2002. Shift in cropping and its effects on human nutrition: Case study from India. Journal of crop production 6:119-124.

40. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2007. Synthesis report. An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf

41. Zakieldeen, S. A. 2009. Adaptation to Climate change: A vulnerability assessment for Sudan. Gatekeeper 142:1-20.

 

42. Young, V. R., Scrimshaw, N. S., Torun, B. & Vitieri, F. 1979. Soybean protein in human nutrition; an overview. Journal of American Oil Chemistry Society 56:110-120.

43. Smart, J. 1989. The Potential Value of Under – exploited Plants in Soil Conservation and Land Reclamation. In: Wickens, G.E., Hag, N, and Day, P. (ed.). New Crops for Food and Industry. Chapman and Hall, London. pp.93-100.

44. Potter, D. & Doyle, J. J. 1992. Origin of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa, Leguminosae): evidence from morphology, isozymes, chloroplast DNA and Linguistics. Economic Botany 46:276-292.

 

 

Table 1: Essential Amino acid content of some tropical food and feeding stuffs (Mg/N)

 

Common names

Botanical names

Argi-nine

Histi-dine

Iso-leucine

Leucine

Lysine

Phenyl-alanine

Tyrosine

Cystine

Methio-ninie

Threo-nine

Trip-tophan

Valine

Cowpea

Vigna unguiculata

444

194

256

456

394

325

190

106

119

238

60

325

Groundnut (whole)

Arachis hypogaea

775

150

250

438

319

325

220

81

88

244

70

313

Gnut protein (Arachin)

Arachis hypoagea

763

119

413

425

250

344

300

81

38

144

56

244

Gnut protein (Conarachin)

Arachis hypogaea

744

119

219

363

375

106

156

163

106

113

31

200

Soybean meal

Glycine max

519

175

306

488

406

306

200

94

94

244

81

319

Lima bean

Phaseolus lunatus

388

206

350

556

431

400

160

61

119

300

56

363

Bambara nut

Vigna subterranea

394

118

275

494

400

350

219

180

113

219

-

331

Field bean

Dolichus lablab

456

163

228

525

388

325

220

69

50

225

-

244

Common pea

Pisum sativum

-

-

350

520

460

320

250

80

80

240

70

350

Green gram seed

Phaseolus aureus

-

188

350

560

430

300

100

40

70

200

50

370

Pigeon pea

Cajanus cajan

419

213

238

475

438

544

210

75

94

213

30

313

Sunflower seed

Helianthus annuus

513

137

356

419

238

313

163

88

213

250

81

331

Geocarpa seed

Kerstingiella geocarpa

425

181

275

494

388

369

220

63

94

244

-

406

Stenocarpa seed

Sphenostylis stenocarpa

388

231

275

481

425

331

270

94

119

256

-

350

Source: [24].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1. The Distribution of African yam bean in Africa (Source: [44]).

 

 

Plate 1

Plate 1. Diversity in colour, colour pattern, structure, texture, brilliance etc. of African yam bean seeds

 

Plate 2

Plate 2. Tuberous root of an accession of African yam bean

 

Plate 3

Plate 3: An African yam bean plant with mature pods ready for harvest